The worksheet keeps identity, category or scope, source, verification date and unresolved conditions together. A logo or copied certificate image is a starting point for checking, not the result.
Worked example
The example asks whether a proposed practitioner’s name, number and category match the relevant professional-body record. For a course claim, use the applicable issuing or quality-assurance body and verify the exact programme and provider relationship.
Use the resource
Record the evidence you actually obtain. If an official record is unavailable or ambiguous, mark the result unresolved and request clarification. Do not describe an attempted search as successful verification.
Worked record
| Exact claim | Person/provider and reference | Issuing/verification source | Checked date | Result and scope | Open question |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illustrative professional registration claim | Exact name, number and category required | Relevant professional-body record | Enter date | Unresolved until matched | Confirm current status and category |
How to use it
- Copy the exact claim being checked.
- Match identity and reference.
- Use the relevant official source.
- Retain the result, date and limits.
Your working record
Enter your information, then download a copy to keep it. Entries stay in this tab and are not saved automatically.
Blank record
Download a blank copy for offline reference or printing. Complete the editable record above to save your entries.
Download blank recordRelated guidance and resources
Source context
- Current Diba consulting services
Eight client-approved service categories; not assignment-specific capacity.
- SACPCMP official website
Professional-body starting point; no named practitioner verified.
- QCTO: choosing a skills development provider
Verification of provider and course scope with the relevant body.
Source context checked 6 October 2026. Examples are illustrative.