This checklist helps organise an agreed plan evaluation. It is not an exhaustive legal compliance checklist or an approval of a contractor’s work.
Worked example
The example asks whether a plan’s version and work package match the information being reviewed. Further prompts cover project criteria, activity interfaces, response ownership and revision tracking. The reviewer must choose criteria relevant to the actual project.
Use the resource
Mark each prompt as evidenced, unclear, outside scope or awaiting information. An empty response should not become an automatic pass. Keep the supporting reference and a precise clarification request beside each item.
Worked record
| Review prompt | Evidence reference | Status | Clarification | Response owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current plan version matches submission list | Example issue register, revision B | Unclear | Two attachments show revision A; confirm current set | Contractor coordinator |
| Project criteria identified | Enter agreed specification/reference | Awaiting information | Supply applicable criteria | Assign owner |
| Work interfaces described | Enter relevant plan section | Awaiting review | Record exact question after review | Assign owner |
How to use it
- Agree evaluation scope and criteria.
- Identify the submission versions.
- Record evidence and unresolved prompts.
- Transfer comments into the revision log.
Your working record
Enter your information, then download a copy to keep it. Entries stay in this tab and are not saved automatically.
Blank record
Download a blank copy for offline reference or printing. Complete the editable record above to save your entries.
Download blank recordRelated guidance and resources
Source context
- Current Diba consulting services
Eight client-approved service categories; not assignment-specific capacity.
Source context checked 6 October 2026. Examples are illustrative.